what the bleep do we know debunked

But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. That's its claim anyway. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). He has however just released his third book of pretty crystal pictures. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. BBC - Movies - review - What The Bleep Do We Know!? DVD Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). What the Bleep Do We Know!? ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. But that still doesn't mean that, at a global level, the weirdness of quantum mechanics is manifest. Do We Know!?) And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. Critical Analysis of 'What The Bleep Do We Know' Part 1 bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. " !" | (1080p What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. So what constitutes quantum quackery? Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes What the 'Bleep'!?:Down The Rabbit Hole - DVD Talk What The Bleep Do We Know - Wakelet The quantum world does pervade everything around us, but as Richard Feynman liked to say, "Scientific creativity is imagination in a straitjacket." Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. contact customer service I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. It was one of the most important moments in history. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. Check out this great listen on Audible.com. Is this a hoax to promote positivity? log out. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. [1], The films co-director, Mark Vicente, would go on to co-found The Knife Media, a pro-Trump digital news outlet linked to NXIVM. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. Do We (K)now!? It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. Now comes the audio edition of the book based on the mind-boggling movie that grossed $11 million in the U.S. alone. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. It's certainly not. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . We'll never know. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. Occasionally recalling a physics lesson, an acid trip, and a lost afternoon at a New Age bookstore, What The BLEEP Do We Know?! Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . Sol. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. Our work isn't possible without your support. is god-awful. Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Prominent if you go by citations that is. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. 1. What the Bleep do we know - Internet Archive From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. ( ) - What the bleep Do we know asks nothing but . What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole (2006) - IMDb Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=. That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. Review of the What the Bleep Do We Know? - Christian Research Institute They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? - Letterboxd Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - WatchDocumentaries.com Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). You are free to comment as you wish. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? It is just a movie. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. Questions about What the Bleep Do We Know? : askscience Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 (Source: iStockphoto). Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". That's not the case. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. and published a study guide. This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying.